Notwithstanding the vast amount of straitening post-election commentary that has appeared across the right-wing media, I thought it might be in order to offer one or two thoughts of my own.  Apologies now to anyone who doesn’t mind if they never read another word about this sorry issue!

As every politically-minded person has surely realised, the impressive block-voting of non-whites has put demographics at the centre of political calculation. The GOP in its current form is already electorally obsolete.  Two-thirds of a static white electorate will never again be sufficient to command an electoral majority.  The one-third of white Americans, particularly single women, voting Democrat were already gestured towards by the GOP’s rejection of Bachman, Cain, Santorum, Gingrich, and the libertarian Constitutionalist Ron Paul.  Romney was supposed a flip-flopper, a RINO, and therefore electable to all those Republican voters lost in 2008.  Now he is the point from which the party has to migrate to find a majority.  It has to reach out to blacks and Hispanics, and it cannot even rely any more on conservative minorities like Alan West.

For mainstream political observers the interesting question is how the GOP will adapt to this new reality and retain its present constituencies.  Nationalists, however, already know that the constant pursuit of conservative movements is not principle but relevance.  Ultimately, it’s about power, and nothing is likely to change this time.  The party managers will take the Christian Right for granted.  After all, where can it go without entirely marginalising itself?  The new party line will say little that is critical of illegal migrants, abortion, or homosexual politics.  It will trumpet a more anti-statist and economically liberal platform.  This, in turn, will redefine the political centre, and narrow the national debate even further, and that will generate a new bout of radicalism on the left.

Now let’s look for a few aspects in this of particular interest to nationalists.

READ MORE...

Congressman,

First of all:  Congratulations!

I am proud to have designed and help construct your 4’ by 8’ sign at the highest traffic intersection of Shenandoah, IA.  Your election, with the presence of Des Moines in our district, made our Tuesday night victory party here in Shenandoah a true celebration.

I grew up in Iowa and lived for 18 years in California starting during the Reagan Administration.  Indeed, I lived on the border of Mexico, in Imperial Beach, CA, during Reagan’s 1986 amnesty.  Over the next 15 years I watched California change until I could no longer tolerate living there.  I first moved north to Washington State where I was on the State platform committee for the GOP, but finally saw the fruits of the 1986 amnesty fall there as well.

That’s when I moved back to Iowa.

Immigration, both legal as well as illegal, is killing this country.  I can even see incipient signs of it here in southwest Iowa.

If the House doesn’t stop this destruction of America during this term, when the Republican’s have control of the purse strings—possibly for the last time—I’ll have no country.  My father, who joined the nascent Air Force prior to Pearl Harbor because of Lindbergh’s warnings of Germany’s air power—before he died in 2008—expressed a similar feeling, having retired to southern Texas.  We talked about how privileged he was to be able to truly fight for his country and how deprived I had been:  to watch my country be conquered without even being given a chance to fight for it.

Sincerely,

James Bowery

I’ve decided to vote for Mitt Romney and enthusiastically recommend that others, including die-hard Obama and Ron Paul supporters, vote for him. I do this with with a vague feeling of nausea because I know I’ll be misunderstood. Please let me explain. I’m not kidding. I’m serious as a heart attack about this endorsement.

The government’s scientific establishment has been suppressing a technology that would disintermediate virtually all centralized structures of civilization: cold fusion. The general elite attitude has been that something that can save the world dare not come out of a podunk university—let alone one in Utah. There’s also the vague unconscious sense that disintermediation on that scale would upset just about every establishment apple-cart, but that’s not the proximate reason for the suppression. It’s really just religious piety showing obescience to the Ivy League that’s the bottom line on why we don’t, today, have a completely clean, decentralized and virtually limitless energy source you can by at Home Depot for a few hundred dollars. This is so entrenched in the scientific establishment—so much of the “church of physics” claim to piety depends on maintaining this falsehood that it really would take Presidential attention to counteract it enough that even private capital, let alone public funding, would be allocated appropriate to the potential.

So what has this to do with Mitt Romney?

Mitt Romney has made a comment, about as ignorant is you can get, about cold fusion that is, despite its ignorance, a positive comment. Understand that to the government’s physics establishment this is tantamount to a candidate for Pope proclaiming Beelzebub a candidate for Sainthood. Moreover, being a Mormon, he is far from biased against a major discovery coming out of Utah. Although in this particular case the Mormon university BYU’s scientist, Steven Jones, played a significant role in helping the scientific establishment suppress cold fusion, that bit of history is obscure enough that it falls well beyond the abject level of knowledge that Mitt Romney has displayed about cold fusion.

Four years ago Barack Hussein Obama II was elected to the office of President of the United States of America.  It was something new, and while everybody in White Nationalism saw the “hope” nonsense and the “change” nonsense for what it was, by no means every White Nationalist was unhappy about Obama’s victory.  Some even voted for him.

There was, of course, another, darker, grittier hope of change, born in the belief that, inevitably, white Americans would be pushed closer to, and perhaps even beyond, what they can bear.  The hand of federal government control would grow heavy.  The economy would slump.  The taxes would increase.  The racial injustice would mount.  Everything in the white American life would become worse, and not by a little but a lot.  Anger, frustration and cynicism would take hold.  A search for alternatives beyond the GOP, beyond the prescribed news of the media, would take hold too, and WN’s long hoped-for change in the somnolence of white America would come closer.

Well, we got the Tea Party and Arizona SB 1070, I suppose.  But tomorrow the incumbent is expected by most onlookers to secure his second term.  So what do WNs expect “worse-wise” from that, and how do they assess the viability of the “worse is better” scenario?  Are we seeing any movement at all in the white American thrall to the mainstream?  What, after all, would it look like?  How long would it take to become obvious?  And what, if anything, can be expected to develop in the next four years?

Leicester is the tenth largest city in England, and the first, it is said, in which the English natives have been tipped over into minority status (though that is not officially confirmed).  It is also the burial place of “the last English king”, and of the arising of the first English Community Group.

The group was formed last year with the help and guidance of the English charity, The Steadfast Trust.  Its first significant project has been a poll of local opinion in areas like Braunstone where there is a high proportion of English people resident.  Some 5,000 questionnaires were sent out, and 112 were returned completed.  That’s a 2.24% response rate.  Now, that’s not a high rate, and probably doesn’t exceed the average vote in the city (these days) for the BNP.  But if one doesn’t pay too much heed to the number, there is some pretty startling stuff here.

The question, of course, is how far from representativeness the results are for the English of Leicester.  A YouGov study conducted in 2006 showed that 55% of respondees agreed with BNP policies when the name of the party was not attached to them, falling to 49% when it was.  So I wouldn’t write it off merely as an exercise in assorting the BNP supporters from the good folk of Leicester.

Here, anyway, are the survey results.

READ MORE...

The Atlantic’s sensational article titled “Hacking the President’s DNA” would be merely sensational (after all, we’re only talking about the DNA-targeted assassination of world “leaders”—“leaders” that are as fungible as crack cocaine) were it not for this section:

Despite a budget of $3 billion, progress did not come quickly. Even after years of hard work, many experts doubted that the time and money budgeted would be enough to complete the job.

This started to change in 1998, when the entrepreneurial biologist J. Craig Venter and his company, Celera, got into the race. Taking advantage of the exponential growth in biotechnology, Venter relied on a new generation of gene sequencers and a novel, computer-intensive approach called shotgun sequencing to deliver a draft human genome (his own) in less than two years, for $300 million.

Venter’s achievement was stunning; it was also just the beginning. By 2007, just seven years later, a human genome could be sequenced for less than $1 million. In 2008, some labs would do it for $60,000, and in 2009, $5,000. This year, the $1,000 barrier looks likely to fall. At the current rate of decline, within five years, the cost will be less than $100. In the history of the world, perhaps no other technology has dropped in price and increased in performance so dramatically….

Gathering the equipment required to do all of this isn’t trivial, and yet, as researchers have upgraded to new tools, as large companies have merged and consolidated operations, and as smaller shops have run out of money and failed, plenty of used lab equipment has been dumped onto the resale market. New, the requisite gear would cost well over $1 million. On eBay, it can be had for as little as $10,000. Strip out the analysis equipment—since those processes can now be outsourced—and a basic cell-culture rig can be cobbled together for less than $1,000. Chemicals and lab supplies have never been easier to buy; hundreds of Web resellers take credit cards and ship almost anywhere.

This is the engineering of pathogens whose virulence is targeted so specifically that it can kill only one person in the world while rendering the rest of the infected suffering from nothing more than virus-transmitting extended phenotypes such as sneezing.

An individual’s DNA is merely an extreme case of genetic correlation structure.  It is far simpler to have a less-specific genetic correlation structure be the DNA target, eg: race or ethnicity.

Moreover, there is no particular reason that the virulence of the pathogen to the target need be fatal.  For many purposes it would suffice to merely make it debilitating in some way—such as a propensity toward obesity which has a variety of effects on reproductive viability, longevity and cognition.  Or it might affect only certain areas of the brain involved in territorial defense such as the amygdala (as does HIV) without seriously impacting other aspects of the organism.

There have been rumors, for years, that Israeli scientists had been working on ethnospecific biological weapons.  There were few, if any other nation states outside of Africa in a position of sufficient ethnocentrism, moral insularity and secrecy to even consider pursuing such a program.  As the scale of the ethnospecific bioweapon laboratory decreases below that requiring the resources of a nation state, the number of such laboratories is bound to proliferate.

It is fairly clear that there may already exist several such laboratories in Asia and the Near East, and perhaps in Latin America.  In the West, the only place such laboratories plausibly exist are in the neocon-controlled bowels of the DoD, although the concentration of Dravidians, increasingly taking the CTO positions of the Fortune 1000, particularly in Silicon Valley, combined with their obvious ethnocentric designs on the United States, makes it likely they will soon have laboratories of this kind on US soil.  Similar situations obtain in Great Britain.

One thing is clear:  People with the genetic correlation structures we think of as “our” race’s DNA are not among those at the vanguard of such ethnocentric, morally insular and secretive scientists.

We can, perhaps, take some comfort in the fact that almost all of those who would target our genetic correlation structures will leave our women relatively healthy—although they might well be cognitively debilitated to make them more “tolerant” of the sexual advances of untargeted men.

An update to my series on Ocean Frontier Fertility started here at MR in 2006.

An entrepreneur dumped 100 tons of iron sulphate off the coast of Vancouver, British Columbia, causing a phytoplankton bloom, the purpose of which was to feed algae-grazing sockeye salmon and increase the harvest for Amerindian tribes economically dependent on salmon.

The globalist chattering class is in an uproar.  To listen to them, this madman is running a substantial risk of permanently damaging the fragile ecosystems being fertilized, if not the entire ocean hence biosphere.

What you won’t read in the reports of this event from venerable institutions like the National Geographic and The Smithsonian is that volcanic eruptions, nearby in the Gulf of Alaska—eruptions that dumped hundreds of tons of iron into the ocean—have historically been followed, 2 years later, by surges in sockeye salmon runs.  This isn’t even controversial.

Indeed, as described in my prior installments on “Ocean Frontier Fertility”, the prospect of iron fertilization for agriculture is so great that it is plausible that much, if not most, of the biosphere’s arable lands could be returned to their natural state—a catastrophically beneficial global environmental change.  We don’t even need to discuss whether carbon would be sequestered, let alone whether global warming is anthropogenic to see that conducting iron fertilization tests on this scale is a no-brainer “go” decision from an environmental viewpoint.

So what is really behind the globalist hysterics?  Why do they hate the environment so much that they would wish to prevent the return of the Amazon rainforest—return the Midwest US prairie and bison—return African habitats to the rare and endangered species—all while feeding the world on high quality, brain-developing protein and fish oils?  Is it that they hate African children who would benefit greatly by such nutrition?

Of course not.

They are afraid that whites might get loose again—this time to the oceans—and avoid the accelerating extinction of their unique genetic endowment of individual sovereignty bequeathed to whites by their “barbaric” culture, the way they almost did in the New World.

Its that simple.